Fptp is favourable to the Labour party

The false assumption made by people on the right who support fptp is that people will be prepared to vote for a party they don't like very much (the Tories) in order to keep out Labour. This is a false assumption. History shows that people are prepared to 'let' Labour win even if they are anti-tyranny if it (the alternative) means voting for someone they do not like. Rather than to support the Tories people are prepared to let Labour win which means the assumptions made by people on the right supporting fptp are false. The right are wrong to support fptp because people will let Labour win even if they do not like tyranny. People are prepared to let Labour win even if that means failing in their (false) obligation to vote Tory. Fptp puts an obligation on supporters of each side to vote for their respective dominant party otherwise they will lose out to the opposition. Since no such obligation exists in reality this is better for the left who are less disinclined to be collectivist. Since there is no such obligation to vote for any party then pr is best. Fptp assumes an obligation to vote for the Tory party or it is knowingly socialist. Fptp is either deliberately favourable to the Labour party or it (incorrectly) assumes people are obligated to vote for the Tories. Since there is no obligation then fptp is favourable to the Labour party.