Pr is good unless democracy is good for the state

We can say by definition that a voting system is to be welcomed if it makes it easy to remove socialists. If someone who seeks to be a politician wants to take control of private spending then the purpose of democracy is to enable the people to remove that person. The purpose of democracy is to enable the people to remove socialists but with fptp it is not easy to do so because the system degenerates into only two parties which means that people get less choice... and if there is less choice there will be more socialism. The problem with fptp is that it makes it difficult for voters to remove socialism. A voting system is bad if it is hard for the people to remove socialism as it is with fptp and so fptp is bad and by contrast pr is good. If pr is bad then it is bad (for the people) to be able to remove socialists.